1. Welcome to SocialHangar.net! The place where everything Airlines is shared, discussed and debated. Whether you're a frequent traveler or a fan of airliners and airports you'll be able to find what you need here...so browse around, take a look and register if you like what you see. Registration is simple...just click on the 'Sign Up Now' link to the right of this message to get your FREE account (you can also choose to register using Facebook). Once you register this message will disappear. Hope you'll join us!

The Twin aircraft crashed killing the pilot!!

Discussion in 'Airplane, Aircraft & Jumbo Jet Talk' started by Richard Wyeroski, Oct 15, 2019.

  1. Richard Wyeroski

    Richard Wyeroski Hangar Gold Member I

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Messages:
    8,696
    Likes Received:
    20,828
    Trophy Points:
    926
    Gender:
    Male
    Country:
    United States United States
    I am amazed that accidents like this still occur. The Linemen did not know the aircraft was not a jet and pumped Jet-A into it! The pilot did not notice the Jet-A truck and did not get out of the aircraft during the fueling!. The line men was able to force the Jet-A nozzle into the fuel tank!.......

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MORE
    NTSB Releases Preliminary Report From Piper Aerostar Accident


    Airplane Was Apparently Misfueled With Jet A
    The NTSB has released a preliminary report from an accident which occurred on October 5, 2019 about 1637 eastern daylight time involving a Piper Aerostar 602P, N326CW. The aircraft departed from Kokomo Municipal Airport (KOKK), Kokomo, Indiana, and impacted a field about 3.6 miles south of the airport. The airplane was destroyed by impact forces. The airline transport pilot sustained fatal injuries. The airplane was registered to Indiana Paging Network Inc and was operated by the pilot under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a business flight that was not operating on a flight plan. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight while departing from KOKK.

    [​IMG]

    On the day of the accident, the flight departed from Peter O Knight Airport (KTPF), Tampa, Florida, about 0645 and arrived at OKK about 1027. The purpose of the flight was for the pilot, who was employed by In Flight Review, Inc, based in Tampa, Florida, to provide Piper PA-42 Cheyenne recurrent training to a customer based at KOKK.

    According to the airport employee who fueled the airplane, he asked the pilot of N326CW, while on approach to the airport, if he wanted jet fuel, and the pilot said "yes." He said the he asked the pilot if he wanted jet fuel because the airplane looked like a jet airplane. When the airplane arrived, the employee pulled the Jet A fuel truck out and parked it in front of the airplane while the pilot was still inside the airplane. The employee said that he asked the pilot again if he was wanted jet fuel, and the pilot said "yes." The employee fueled the airplane with about 163 gallons of Jet A from the fuel truck. The employee said that he was able to orientate the different shaped nozzle (relative to the 100 low lead fuel truck nozzle) from the Jet A fuel truck by positioning it 90 degrees over the wing fuel tank filler necks and about 45 degrees over the fuselage filler necks. He said the he initially spilled about one gallon of fuel during refueling and adjusted his technique so subsequent fuel spillage was minimal.

    The Jet A fuel truck had "JET A" on its left, right, and rear sides.

    The employee that was inside the fixed base operator building about 1620 heard the engines start. After the engines started, the engines sounded "typical." He said that he did not hear any radio transmissions from the pilot during his departure and did not hear an engine runup.

    The pilot, who received recurrent training from the accident pilot, stated the accident pilot began training right away beginning about 1045. They completed training and it was after 1630 when the pilot drove the accident pilot to N326CW. The pilot said the accident pilot visually checked the fuel tanks of the airplane and gave a "thumbs-up" to the pilot. The pilot did not stay for the remainder of the accident pilot's preflight and drove off. The pilot heard the engines start and "they sounded normal." The pilot did not see the takeoff. The pilot said the winds favored runway 14, which was in use on the day of the accident.

    A witness stated that she saw a "low flying" airplane flying from north to south. The airplane made a "sharp left turn" to the east. The left wing "dipped low" and she then lost sight of the airplane but when she approached the intersection near the accident site, she saw the airplane on the ground.

    Post-accident examination of the airplane revealed the airplane wreckage path was about 328 ft in length along an approximate heading of 046° on a dry and hard surfaced fallow bean field. Components of the left side of the airplane were near the southwestern portion of the wreckage path. The wreckage and the wreckage path displayed features consistent with an accelerated stall.

    The examination revealed the presence of a clear liquid consistent in color and order with that of Jet A in a fuselage tank and in the fuel lines leading to the fuel manifolds of both engines. Several of the engine spark plugs exhibited damage consistent with detonation. Flight control continuity was confirmed. The landing gear was in the retracted position.

    NATA released a statement following the release of the preliminary report. “The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) was saddened to learn of a recent preliminary report of a fatal aircraft accident related to a suspected misfueling. Aircraft misfuelings are preventable through proper training and eliminating these incidents is a top priority for NATA and our membership. NATA’s Misfueling Prevention Program can be accessed free of charge at www.preventmisfueling.com and includes learning tracks for line service professionals, customer service representatives, FBO managers, and pilots,” stated NATA president Gary Dempsey. “NATA urges ALL FBOs, regardless if you are a member of NATA, and pilots to use this complimentary resource NATA created for the industry. NATA is dedicated to working with our members, partners, and other industry stakeholders to educate the aviation community and keep our skies safe and secure.”

    NTSB report
     
    Everett 757, Kevin and Lord Leighton like this.
  2. Lord Leighton

    Lord Leighton Hangar Gold Member I

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2013
    Messages:
    15,403
    Likes Received:
    32,532
    Trophy Points:
    926
    Gender:
    Male
    Country:
    United States United States
    I don't believe the refueler and if he had ANY question from experience about the filler nozzle not fitting the receptacle properly, he should have stopped right there.
     
  3. Richard Wyeroski

    Richard Wyeroski Hangar Gold Member I

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Messages:
    8,696
    Likes Received:
    20,828
    Trophy Points:
    926
    Gender:
    Male
    Country:
    United States United States
    agreed, but one has to ask why did it happen?

    I think a good procedure would be what they do in hospitals!!!....it seems they cut the wrong leg off a patient and since then they would confirm the patient name and what he or she were in the hospital for.

    Maybe the FAA should require something like the pilot has to confirm the fuel type with the line man?

    The pilot had to see that he was getting Jet-A?.....but why he didn’t will ever be known?

    Yes definitely a different procedure is needed, I say with anything that is twin engine. Guess what!.....then this accident would not have happened!
     
    Everett 757, Kevin and Lord Leighton like this.
  4. Lord Leighton

    Lord Leighton Hangar Gold Member I

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2013
    Messages:
    15,403
    Likes Received:
    32,532
    Trophy Points:
    926
    Gender:
    Male
    Country:
    United States United States
    They've always said the pilot should be right there next to the fueler just as a precaution. Being preoccupied in the cockpit doesn't count.
     
  5. Kevin

    Kevin Hangar Bronze Member IV

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    449
    Likes Received:
    1,230
    Trophy Points:
    61
    Gender:
    Male
    Country:
    United States United States
    The whole story by the lineman just doesn't add up. I don't know how preoccupied the pilot was not to notice a tanker truck marked "JET A" right in front of his aircraft and say "Whoa wait a second here! What's this guy doing?" So I don't know if I buy that statement made by the lineman.
    Then the lineman himself working the filler nozzle and forcing it to fit. A light bulb should have gone off in his head instead of trying to force the nozzle. Again that chain of events that cause an accident, break one link and no accident.
     
  6. Everett 757

    Everett 757 Hangar Silver Member VII

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2012
    Messages:
    3,818
    Likes Received:
    8,731
    Trophy Points:
    726
    Gender:
    Male
    Country:
    United States United States
  7. Richard Wyeroski

    Richard Wyeroski Hangar Gold Member I

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Messages:
    8,696
    Likes Received:
    20,828
    Trophy Points:
    926
    Gender:
    Male
    Country:
    United States United States
    This accident should have never happened! However unfortunately nothing will change and it will happen again and again and again........
     
    Everett 757, Kevin and Lord Leighton like this.
  8. Everett 757

    Everett 757 Hangar Silver Member VII

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2012
    Messages:
    3,818
    Likes Received:
    8,731
    Trophy Points:
    726
    Gender:
    Male
    Country:
    United States United States
    Unfortunately that’s very true, and very sad. :(
     
    Kevin and Lord Leighton like this.

Share This Page